Do Startup Founders Need D&O Insurance?

You’re raising a seed round. The term sheet arrives. Buried in the conditions precedent: “The Company shall obtain Directors and Officers liability insurance with minimum coverage of £2 million prior to closing.”

You’ve bootstrapped to this point. The company has five employees, £200,000 ARR, and barely enough runway to reach the next milestone. D&O insurance feels like premature corporate infrastructure, something for later-stage companies with institutional boards and complex governance.

But the investor requirement is explicit. Without D&O, the round doesn’t close.

This article explains when startup founders actually need D&O insurance, what triggers the requirement, how early-stage risk differs from mature companies, and the practical decision about whether to arrange cover proactively or wait until explicitly required.

The Core Question: What Personal Liability Do Founders Actually Face?

Directors face personal legal liability under UK company law. This isn’t theoretical, it’s statutory duty with real financial consequences.

The Companies Act 2006 codifies seven fiduciary duties that directors owe to the company: duty to act within powers, promote company success, exercise independent judgement, exercise reasonable care and skill, avoid conflicts of interest, not accept benefits from third parties, and declare interests in transactions.

Breach these duties, and directors can be held personally liable for losses the company or shareholders suffer as a result.

The Insolvency Act 1986 creates wrongful trading provisions. If directors continue trading when they know or should know the company can’t avoid insolvent liquidation, they become personally liable for company debts incurred during that period.

For a struggling startup that keeps trading in hope of a turnaround, this is material exposure. If liquidators later determine you should have known the company was insolvent three months before it actually failed, you’re personally liable for debts incurred in those three months.

Regulatory obligations create personal director liability. Data protection under UK GDPR, financial services regulation under FCA rules, employment law under equality legislation, all create circumstances where directors can be pursued personally, not just the company.

The question isn’t whether founders face personal liability. They do, from the moment they become directors. The question is whether that liability justifies insurance, and if so, when.

According to the British Business Bank, approximately 35% of UK startups that receive venture capital funding arrange D&O insurance during their seed or Series A rounds, with that percentage rising to 78% by Series B, indicating that while early-stage D&O remains discretionary for many founders, it becomes standard practice as companies scale and governance complexity increases.

When Investors Explicitly Require D&O

The most common driver of D&O insurance for startups is investor requirement, typically appearing at institutional funding rounds.

Seed rounds from institutional funds. Some institutional seed funds require D&O as standard practice. Others don’t, viewing it as premature for companies at pre-revenue or early-revenue stages.

The pattern: Larger seed funds (£5 million+ fund size) and later-seed investors (investing at £1 million+ valuations) are more likely to require D&O than angel syndicates or micro-VCs investing at earlier stages.

If your seed round is led by an institutional fund, expect D&O requirements. If it’s angel or high-net-worth individuals, it’s less likely but still possible.

Series A and beyond. D&O becomes standard at Series A. Most Series A term sheets explicitly require D&O insurance with specified minimums (typically £2 million to £5 million) as a condition precedent to closing.

The investor logic at Series A:

• They’re appointing board members who assume personal fiduciary duties
• The company has meaningful revenue, employees, and operational complexity
• Shareholder structure includes multiple investor classes with potential conflicts
• Directors need protection from governance liability as the company scales

By Series B, D&O is universal. No institutional investor at growth stage closes without D&O in place.

The timing challenge. Investor requirements typically appear in the term sheet, which is issued 4-8 weeks before closing. You then have that window to:

• Obtain D&O quotes from insurers
• Complete underwriting (proposal forms, financial information, board details)
• Bind coverage and obtain certificates
• Provide proof to investors before closing

This is doable but creates time pressure alongside all other closing mechanics. Starting the D&O process early, when term sheet negotiations begin rather than after signature, eliminates last-minute scrambles.

When Board Composition Drives D&O Requirements

The second major trigger is recruiting non-executive directors or independent board members.

Quality non-executives won’t join without D&O. Experienced operators, former executives, sector specialists, the people who add real value to startup boards, routinely require D&O as a precondition to appointment.

Their perspective is straightforward: “I’m assuming personal fiduciary liability for £20,000-£50,000 annual compensation. I’m not risking my personal assets without appropriate insurance protection.”

The conversation happens during board recruitment: “Do you have D&O cover? What are the limits? May I review the policy wording?” If the answer is no, they politely decline or make their acceptance conditional on arranging cover.

Advisory boards vs formal directorships. Some startups create advisory boards to access expertise without formal director appointments. Advisors don’t assume statutory director duties and typically don’t require D&O (though they may request indemnity provisions in advisory agreements).

But if you want formal directors, people who attend board meetings, vote on resolutions, and assume fiduciary duties, you need D&O to recruit quality candidates.

The founder-only board dynamic. Many early-stage startups have boards consisting solely of founders. In this scenario, D&O requirements are lower, founders are managing their own money and their own risk.

But the moment you add external directors (investors’ appointees, independent non-executives, experienced operators), their perspective changes the calculus. They’re not managing their own risk; they’re assuming liability for decisions about your company and your shareholders’ capital.

D&O becomes essential to recruit and retain quality board members who aren’t founders.

The Bootstrapped Founder’s Dilemma

For founders who haven’t raised institutional capital and aren’t recruiting independent directors, the D&O decision is discretionary rather than mandated.

The case for early D&O (even without requirements):

Personal asset protection. If the company fails and liquidators investigate wrongful trading, your personal assets, home, savings, investments, are at risk without D&O. Side A coverage protects you when the company can’t indemnify (because it’s insolvent).

Regulatory investigation protection. Even small startups face regulatory risk. ICO investigations for data breaches, HMRC disputes, employment tribunal claims—all can target directors personally. D&O covers defence costs and potentially settlements.

Shareholder dispute protection. If you have co-founders or early employees with equity, shareholder disputes can arise. D&O covers claims that you breached fiduciary duties to minority shareholders or mismanaged the company to their detriment.

Cost is modest relative to risk. £1 million D&O cover for a startup costs £2,000-£4,000 annually. For bootstrapped founders watching every pound, that’s meaningful. But compared to potential personal liability (wrongful trading claims can reach hundreds of thousands), it’s risk management.

The case for waiting:

Capital efficiency. Early-stage companies have limited resources. Spending £3,000 on insurance means £3,000 not spent on product, marketing, or hiring. Some founders reasonably prioritise operational spend over insurance.

Low practical risk at pre-revenue stage. A company with no revenue, no employees, and no external shareholders faces minimal director liability risk. You can’t have wrongful trading exposure if there are no creditors. Employment claims don’t arise without employees.

Waiting until you have revenue, employees, or external capital makes sense for many bootstrapped founders.

Can self-insure or accept the risk. Some founders consciously decide to accept personal liability risk rather than insure it. They’re managing their own money, making their own decisions, and willing to bear the consequences.

This is a legitimate choice if you understand the risks and have capacity to absorb potential losses.

The pragmatic middle ground: Wait until one of the clear triggers appears (investor requirement, board recruitment, meaningful revenue/employee count), then arrange D&O promptly. Don’t arrange it at incorporation for a pre-revenue, founder only company. But don’t delay when the risk profile changes.

How Startup Risk Differs from Mature Companies

The director liability risk profile of a 5 person startup differs materially from a 200-person scale-up, which affects both whether you need D&O and what limits are appropriate.

Startup characteristics that reduce D&O risk:

Simple shareholder structure. Founders plus maybe a few angels or employee shareholders. Low conflict potential, aligned interests. Shareholder disputes are rare when everyone is rowing in the same direction toward exit or growth.

Minimal regulatory obligations. Pre-revenue or early-revenue companies often aren’t regulated. No FCA obligations, minimal data protection complexity, few employment law exposures with small teams.

Limited creditor exposure. Startups usually have more cash than liabilities (thanks to fundraising) until quite late in their lifecycle. Wrongful trading risk is low if the company has £500,000 in the bank and £50,000 in liabilities.

Founder-controlled boards. Decisions are made by people with skin in the game. Founder-directors managing their own capital face different liability dynamics than professional non-executives overseeing others’ companies.

Startup characteristics that increase D&O risk:

High failure rate. Most startups fail. When they do, liquidators investigate director conduct. Even if you did everything right, defending wrongful trading allegations costs money.

Cash burn and insolvency risk. Startups burn through capital quickly. The line between “pursuing growth despite losses” and “wrongful trading while insolvent” can be thin. Directors must make judgement calls about runway and viability, and those judgements can be challenged with hindsight.

Rapid scaling creates governance gaps. Going from 5 to 50 employees in 18 months creates employment law exposure faster than governance processes adapt. Directors can face personal liability for discrimination, harassment, or wrongful termination claims before HR infrastructure is robust.

Complex cap tables with liquidation preferences. Once you have multiple investor rounds with preferences, ratchets, and anti-dilution provisions, shareholder conflicts emerge. Junior shareholders may claim directors favoured senior investors inappropriately.

The risk profile isn’t “startups need D&O” or “startups don’t need D&O.” It’s “understand your specific risk factors and make informed decisions about when to arrange cover.”

The Practical Cost and Coverage for Startups

D&O for early-stage companies is more affordable than most founders expect, but costs increase with company complexity.

Typical premium ranges:

Pre-seed to seed (pre-revenue, <10 employees, founder-only board): £1,500-£3,000 annually for £1 million cover.

Seed to Series A (£100k-£1m revenue, 10-30 employees, may have non-exec directors): £2,500-£6,000 annually for £2 million cover.

Series A to Series B (£1m-£5m revenue, 30-100 employees, investor-appointed directors): £5,000-£12,000 annually for £2-5 million cover.

Costs vary based on:

• Sector (FinTech and regulated businesses pay more)
• Territory (UK-only vs international operations)
• Prior claims or disputes (increases premiums)
• Board composition (more non-executives = more complexity)
• Financial stability (loss-making companies pay more than profitable ones)

Coverage structure for startups. Most startup D&O policies focus on Side A and Side B coverage (protecting directors personally and reimbursing the company when it indemnifies directors).

Side C (entity coverage for securities claims) is typically minimal or excluded for private companies. It becomes relevant approaching IPO.

Key policy features to prioritise:

Side A independence. Ensure Side A coverage is independent of company solvency. If the company fails, Side A must still be available to directors. This is critical for startup founders where insolvency is a realistic possibility.

Broad definition of wrongful acts. The policy should cover breach of duty, neglect, error, omission, breach of trust, and breach of warranty of authority. Narrow definitions create coverage gaps.

Investigation costs coverage. Regulatory investigations can be expensive even if no formal charges result. Ensure the policy covers defence costs for investigations by ICO, HMRC, Companies House, or other authorities.

Employment practices liability extension. If you have employees, ensure the policy covers director liability for employment claims (discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination).

Run-on cover provisions. If the company is acquired, run-on coverage protects former directors from claims arising from the pre-acquisition period. This is essential if you’re building to exit.

Common Mistakes Startup Founders Make

Several patterns of error create problems when founders eventually face D&O claims or coverage disputes.

Arranging cover too late (after disputes arise). Some founders only think about D&O when facing regulatory investigations, shareholder disputes, or insolvency proceedings. At that point, insurers won’t cover known circumstances or pending claims.

D&O is claims-made insurance. It only covers claims made during the policy period for acts that occurred after the retroactive date. If you arrange D&O after problems emerge, those problems aren’t covered.

Underinsuring to save premium. Arranging £500,000 cover instead of £1-2 million to save £800 annually. Then discovering that one wrongful trading claim could result in personal liability exceeding £500,000.

The marginal cost of higher limits is modest. Don’t underinsure to save pennies when the risk is meaningful.

Not reading the policy wording. Founders rely on broker summaries or policy schedules without reading the actual policy wording, particularly exclusions, Side A independence provisions, and definitions of covered wrongful acts.

When claims arise, gaps and exclusions become apparent. Read the wording before you need to rely on it.

Letting cover lapse. Arranging D&O for fundraising, then cancelling it after the round closes to save costs. This creates uninsured gaps for director acts during the lapsed period.

If you arrange D&O, maintain it continuously. Gaps create permanent uninsured exposure for acts during those gaps.

Not notifying circumstances promptly. Becoming aware of potential claims (shareholder complaints, regulatory inquiries, threatened litigation) but not notifying the insurer. When formal claims arrive later, the insurer may argue you should have notified earlier and the claim isn’t covered.

If you become aware of circumstances that might lead to claims, notify your insurer. That protects coverage even if formal claims arrive years later.

According to research from the Chartered Governance Institute UK, approximately 40% of early-stage companies that arrange D&O insurance do so reactively in response to immediate investor or board requirements, versus 25% who arrange cover proactively as part of governance best practice, indicating that while reactive arrangements are more common, proactive founders often secure better terms and avoid last-minute time pressure.

The Decision Framework for Startup Founders

A structured approach to deciding when to arrange D&O:

Mandatory triggers (arrange immediately):

• Investor explicitly requires D&O in term sheet or investment agreement
• Recruiting non-executive directors who require D&O as condition of appointment
• Operating in regulated sectors (FCA, FCA-regulated, healthcare) where director liability risk is material
• Approaching insolvency or struggling with cash burn (wrongful trading risk is high)

Strong indicators (seriously consider):

• Series A or later funding rounds (even if not explicitly required)
• 10+ employees (employment practices liability exposure increases)
• £500,000+ revenue (creditor exposure and commercial complexity increase)
• Complex shareholder structures with multiple investor classes
• International operations or US exposure
• History of shareholder disagreements or disputes

Discretionary (assess based on personal risk appetite):

• Bootstrapped company with no external investors
• Founder-only board with no plans to recruit non-execs
• Pre-revenue or minimal revenue (<£100k ARR)
• <5 employees
• Simple cap table (founders + maybe a few angels)

If multiple discretionary factors apply, consider arranging modest D&O (£1 million) for personal protection. If only one or two apply, you can reasonably wait until stronger indicators emerge.

The timing principle: Arrange D&O when the risk profile changes, not retrospectively after problems arise. Key inflection points: raising institutional capital, recruiting independent directors, reaching material revenue, hiring employees, or facing cash burn pressures.

The Bottom Line

Startup founders need D&O insurance when investors require it, when recruiting non-executive directors, or when the company’s risk profile creates material personal liability exposure, typically at Series A or earlier if operating in regulated sectors.

The requirement isn’t about company size or sophistication. It’s about whether directors face realistic personal liability risk and whether that risk justifies insurance. For pre-revenue, founder-only companies, the risk is low and insurance is discretionary. For funded companies with boards, employees, and commercial complexity, the risk is material and D&O becomes essential.

Typical costs: £1,500-£6,000 annually for £1-2 million cover at seed/Series A stage. The marginal cost of appropriate limits is modest compared to potential personal liability for wrongful trading, shareholder disputes, or regulatory investigations.

The practical decision: If you’re raising institutional capital or recruiting independent directors, arrange D&O proactively, when term sheet negotiations begin, not after signature when closing mechanics create time pressure. If you’re bootstrapped and founder-controlled, assess your specific risk factors and decide whether to self-insure or transfer risk.

Common mistakes: arranging cover too late (after disputes emerge), underinsuring to save premium, not reading policy wordings, letting cover lapse, and failing to notify circumstances promptly.

The strategic insight: D&O isn’t corporate bureaucracy or premature governance theatre. It’s personal asset protection for individuals assuming statutory liability by serving as directors. The question isn’t whether you eventually need it, you probably do. The question is when your risk profile justifies the cost, and whether to arrange proactively or wait for explicit requirements.

For most founders, the answer is: arrange it at or before Series A, when recruiting the first non-executive, or when any of the mandatory triggers appear. Earlier if you’re risk-averse and can afford the premium; later if you’re bootstrapped and willing to self-insure until the risk profile clearly justifies external protection.

External Resources

British Business Bank – Startup Funding Research. https://www.british-business-bank.co.uk/research/. UK government-owned economic development bank, publishes authoritative research on UK startup ecosystem and funding trends.

Chartered Governance Institute UK – Corporate Governance Research. https://www.cgi.org.uk/resources-and-guidance. Professional body for governance professionals, publishes research on corporate governance practices and board effectiveness.

 

Simplify Stream provides educational content about business insurance for UK companies, especially those with high growth business models that require specialist insurance market knowledge. We don't sell policies or provide regulated advice, just clear explanations from people who've worked on the underwriting and broking side.