IoT and Connected Device Liability: The Hardware-Software Boundary

Your smart home security camera experiences a firmware bug. The camera fails to detect motion during a break-in. The homeowner’s £50,000 in valuables are stolen. They claim your product defect caused their loss.

Is this product liability (defective physical device), professional indemnity (software error in service delivery), or cyber liability (security system failure)? Your product liability insurer excludes software errors. Your professional indemnity insurer excludes products. Your cyber insurer excludes property theft. Each policy points to the others. You’re potentially uninsured.

IoT and connected devices create multi-dimensional liability requiring coordinated insurance across product liability, professional indemnity, and cyber coverage. Understanding the boundaries and ensuring no gaps determines whether IoT manufacturers are adequately protected.

This article explains IoT product liability UK manufacturers face, the hardware-software-cyber boundary, and how to structure comprehensive coverage for connected devices.

The Unique IoT Liability Landscape

IoT devices combine physical hardware, embedded software, cloud services, mobile apps, and network connectivity—each creating distinct liability exposures.

Physical hardware component: Manufacturing defects, design flaws, electrical safety issues, battery failures, overheating risks.

Liability type: Product liability (bodily injury, property damage from physical device defects).

Embedded software/firmware: Software running on the device itself controlling hardware functions, processing local data, managing device operations.

Liability type: Typically product liability (software integral to product function) unless sold separately as updateable service.

Cloud services: Backend platforms processing device data, AI/ML analytics, remote device management, data storage.

Liability type: Professional indemnity (service delivery) and cyber liability (data breaches, service outages).

Mobile applications: Consumer apps for device control, configuration, and monitoring.

Liability type: Professional indemnity (software errors causing financial loss or operational failures).

Network connectivity and data transmission: WiFi, cellular, Bluetooth, proprietary protocols transmitting data between devices, cloud, and users.

Liability type: Cyber liability (data breaches, unauthorized access) and professional indemnity (service failures).

The liability complexity: A single incident can trigger multiple exposures simultaneously, requiring all three policy types to respond in coordination.

According to IoT Analytics research, the UK has approximately 73 million connected IoT devices as of 2023, growing at 18% annually, with smart home devices and wearables representing the largest consumer categories—demonstrating massive scale of IoT liability exposure.

Product Liability Insurance UK: When Tech Hardware and Life Sciences Need Cover →

Product Liability for IoT Hardware Components

The physical device creates traditional product liability exposure.

Common IoT hardware failures:

Battery and fire risk. Lithium-ion batteries overheating, charging failures causing fires, thermal runaway in battery cells.

Liability scenario: Smart doorbell battery overheats and causes fire. Property damage: £180,000. This is clear product liability—hardware defect causing property damage.

Electrical safety issues. Inadequate insulation causing shock risk, power supply failures, non-compliance with UK electrical safety regulations.

Liability scenario: Smart plug suffers electrical failure causing shock injury to user. Medical costs and pain/suffering: £40,000. Product liability responds.

Mechanical failures. Smart locks failing mechanically (not electronically), robotic devices with moving parts causing injury, structural failures in wearable devices.

Liability scenario: Smart door lock mechanical component fails, preventing entry during emergency. User suffers harm unable to exit burning building. Product liability exposure.

Physical design defects. Sharp edges on wearables causing cuts, inadequate waterproofing causing device failures, poor ergonomics causing repetitive strain injuries.

Typical product liability limits for IoT hardware:

Consumer IoT (smart home, wearables): £5-10 million for companies with national/international distribution.

Industrial IoT (sensors, controllers): £10-25 million reflecting higher-value properties and business interruption exposure.

Medical IoT (connected health devices): £10-50 million given patient safety implications.

Product Liability for Medical Devices: UK Regulatory Requirements →

Software and Service Liability for Cloud Platforms

Cloud services supporting IoT devices create professional indemnity and cyber liability exposure distinct from hardware.

Cloud service failure scenarios:

Data processing errors. AI analytics producing incorrect insights, predictive maintenance algorithms failing to identify issues, home automation logic executing wrong commands.

Liability scenario: Smart thermostat cloud service incorrectly predicts heating needs. Home freezes during cold snap causing pipe bursts. Property damage: £60,000. This is professional indemnity (service error) not product liability (hardware functioned correctly).

Service outages and unavailability. Cloud platform downtime preventing device control, network failures interrupting critical services, server failures causing extended outages.

Liability scenario: Security monitoring service experiences 6-hour outage. During outage, break-in occurs. Theft losses: £40,000. Professional indemnity for service failure.

Data breaches and unauthorized access. Hackers accessing user data through cloud vulnerabilities, data leaks exposing personal information, inadequate access controls.

Liability scenario: Smart camera cloud service breached. 50,000 users’ video feeds exposed. Cyber liability responds to breach notification costs, regulatory fines, user compensation.

Mobile app failures. App crashes preventing device control, configuration errors from app bugs, user interface issues causing incorrect device operation.

Liability scenario: Smart home app bug causes user to disable alarm system inadvertently. Break-in occurs. Professional indemnity exposure for app software error.

Required coverage coordination:

Product liability excludes cloud services and software errors → Need professional indemnity

Professional indemnity excludes cyber incidents → Need cyber liability

Cyber liability excludes physical property damage → Need product liability

All three policies required for comprehensive IoT protection.

The Cyber Liability Dimension

Connected devices create specific cyber exposures beyond traditional product or professional liability.

IoT-specific cyber risks:

Device-level security vulnerabilities. Weak default passwords, unpatched firmware vulnerabilities, inadequate encryption, insecure update mechanisms.

Liability scenario: Smart home hub has default password vulnerability. Hacker accesses all connected devices and user’s network. Data breach and regulatory investigation. Cyber liability responds.

Botnet and DDoS attacks. Compromised IoT devices used in distributed denial-of-service attacks, devices enlisted in botnets without owners’ knowledge.

Liability scenario: 10,000 smart cameras compromised and used in DDoS attack. Device owners face ISP service interruption and potential liability for participating in attack. Complex cyber liability scenario.

Privacy violations. Devices collecting personal data without proper consent, inadequate privacy controls, data sharing without user authorization.

Liability scenario: Wearable device collects health data and shares with third parties without explicit consent. ICO investigation and fines. Cyber liability covers regulatory defence and penalties where insurable.

Ransomware targeting IoT infrastructure. Attackers encrypting cloud platforms or device management systems, demanding ransom for restoration.

Liability scenario: Ransomware attack on cloud platform managing 100,000 home security systems. Systems offline for 48 hours. Cyber liability covers incident response, ransom negotiation (though not ransom payment itself), business interruption.

Cyber insurance coverage for IoT:

Network security liability, privacy liability (GDPR violations), regulatory defence costs, breach notification expenses, crisis management and PR, business interruption from cyber incidents.

Typical cyber limits for IoT companies: £2-5 million for consumer IoT companies, £5-10 million for companies handling sensitive data or operating critical infrastructure.

Multi-Policy Claims Scenarios

Understanding how multiple policies coordinate in real-world scenarios prevents coverage gaps.

Scenario 1: Smart thermostat causes property damage through software bug.

Hardware functions correctly. Software bug causes heating system to malfunction during freeze. Burst pipes cause £70,000 water damage.

Primary coverage: Contested—could be product liability (software integral to product) or professional indemnity (software error).

Best practice: Notify both insurers. Policies coordinate with likely split based on causation analysis.

Scenario 2: Smart lock hacked, resulting in burglary.

Physical lock functions correctly. Cloud service security vulnerability allows hacker to unlock remotely. Burglary causes £55,000 losses.

Primary coverage: Cyber liability (security breach enabling unauthorized access) and potentially professional indemnity (inadequate security in cloud service delivery).

Product liability unlikely to respond: Physical hardware didn’t fail.

Scenario 3: Wearable device battery explodes causing injury AND data breach.

Defective battery causes fire resulting in burns (physical injury: £120,000). Fire damages device exposing health data stored on device (privacy breach affecting 1,000 users).

Primary coverage: Product liability for physical injury from battery defect. Cyber liability for data breach resulting from physical incident.

Both policies respond to different aspects of same event.

Scenario 4: Industrial IoT sensor fails to detect problem.

Sensor hardware functions within specifications. Cloud analytics platform misinterprets sensor data, failing to predict equipment failure. Client experiences production line shutdown. Losses: £400,000.

Primary coverage: Professional indemnity for cloud analytics error (service failure causing financial loss).

Product liability unlikely: Hardware met specifications; issue was analytics service interpretation.

Coordinating Three-Policy Coverage

IoT manufacturers need structured approach ensuring comprehensive protection without gaps.

Policy coordination checklist:

Use same broker for all three policies. Ideally place all with same insurer who can write coordinated wordings avoiding gaps and overlaps.

Explicit wording on boundaries. Each policy should clearly state what it covers and what it pushes to sister policies.

Product liability: “Covers physical device defects. Excludes cloud services (covered under professional indemnity) and cyber incidents (covered under cyber liability).”

Professional indemnity: “Covers software, cloud services, and apps. Excludes physical hardware defects (covered under product liability) and data breaches (covered under cyber liability).”

Cyber liability: “Covers network security, privacy violations, data breaches. Excludes professional errors (covered under PI) and physical product defects (covered under product liability).”

Shared limits where appropriate. Consider whether product liability and professional indemnity should share limits (integrated approach) or have separate limits.

Consistent retentions. Align retentions across policies (e.g., £25,000 retention on all three) to avoid confusion during claims.

Simultaneous notification for ambiguous claims. When claims could fall under multiple policies, notify all relevant insurers immediately and let them coordinate.

Regulatory Compliance: UK Product Security Regime

The Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act 2022 creates new security requirements for IoT devices, affecting liability landscape.

Key requirements (effective from April 2024):

No default passwords (unique passwords per device), vulnerability disclosure policies mandatory, transparency on security update periods (minimum support duration disclosed to consumers).

Enforcement: Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) enforces with powers to issue compliance notices, financial penalties up to £10 million or 4% of global turnover.

Insurance implications: Non-compliance creates regulatory defence exposure (cyber and professional indemnity policies cover regulatory investigations). Compliance demonstrates risk management, improving insurance terms.

The Bottom Line

IoT product liability UK manufacturers face requires coordinating three distinct policies: product liability for hardware defects, professional indemnity for software and cloud services, cyber liability for security and data breaches.

Physical hardware failures (battery fires, electrical faults, mechanical defects) are product liability requiring £5-10 million limits for consumer IoT, £10-25 million for industrial IoT.

Cloud services, mobile apps, and data processing create professional indemnity exposure (£2-5 million typical limits) covering service failures, software errors, and analytics mistakes.

Cyber risks (security vulnerabilities, data breaches, unauthorized access) require cyber liability coverage (£2-5 million limits) addressing network security and privacy violations.

Single incidents often trigger multiple policies: battery fire causing injury (product liability) AND data breach (cyber liability) requires both policies responding to different aspects.

Coordinate through single broker/insurer where possible, explicit policy wordings defining boundaries, simultaneous notification for ambiguous claims, and consistent retentions across all three policies.

UK Product Security regime (PSTI Act 2022) mandates security requirements for IoT devices—compliance reduces liability risk and improves insurance terms.

The essential approach: Recognize IoT creates multi-dimensional exposure requiring layered insurance, invest in policy coordination preventing gaps, maintain all three coverages continuously (gaps create uninsured tail), and treat comprehensive insurance as operational necessity not optional risk management.

External Resource

IoT Analytics – UK IoT Market Data. https://iot-analytics.com/. Leading IoT market research firm, publishes comprehensive data on connected device adoption and growth trends.

 

Simplify Stream provides educational content about business insurance for UK companies, especially those with high growth business models that require specialist insurance market knowledge. We don't sell policies or provide regulated advice, just clear explanations from people who've worked on the underwriting and broking side.